RCU Forums - View Single Post - What is the difference between the OS FX and LA
Thread: What is the difference between the OS FX and LA
View Single Post
Old 04-23-2004 | 08:53 AM
  #6  
Lucam's Avatar
Lucam
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Milano, ITALY
Default RE: What is the difference between the OS FX and LA
ORIGINAL: Gringo Volador

The difference is a cheap motor that is pretty reliable but pretty weak LA and a good all around motor FX. I wouldnt waste money on the LA.
Oh, are you sure?[>:]
I've a lot of flies on .46 LA, and it's a very nice small engine: light, good starter, reliable. I never experienced a dead stik landing, and is so relable in idle... A good characteristic for me, I fly watreplanes too. And I don't like to swim for recover a plane after flame-out landing. [sm=drowning.gif]
It's true, however: FX have lots more power, and probably they are also most durable because of bearings...

But I'm so happy with my LA. I love his coluor too! It matches so close my trainer scheme...
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version Name: Nl31036.jpg Views: 123 Size: 70.6 KB ID: 125484   Click image for larger version Name: To45928.jpg Views: 119 Size: 73.3 KB ID: 125485  
Lucam is offline  
Reply Like