ORIGINAL: yard-dart
C_Watkins,
I admire all of the work you put into that response, but I really don't understand a word of it. Could you put it into plain English for me?
John
What it means is that several years ago, we had 7 frequencies on 72 mHz. If any were subject to interference, we just used that many less channels. Now we have 50 narrow band channels. If any are constantly interfered with, we use others. Do we really need 50 channels for any other reason? I have seen 15-18 aircraft being flown at once. That still leaves over 30 frequencies not in use at any given time. Most clubs I know of limit the number of aircraft to substantially less than 18. We are, and have always been secondary users on the airwaves. There are other bands we can fly on that are subject to other issues, such as the requirement for a ham license or competition from CB stations. Still… when we go to fly, most of us have no problem finding a frequency we can use with a reasonable chance of success.
Anyone that thinks they have 100% control of an RC plane should be aware of these limitations, as well as others. When you take into account you may get glitched, hit, or plain interfered with, it should make you a little bit more hesitant to guide your aircraft in such a manner that it might strike someone or something.
Personally, I agree that obtaining the 50 frequencies is ancient history. They do not belong to the AMA, nor anyone in particular. What the AMA does now, in an effort to protect those frequencies, for AMA members and non-members, alike, is part of the value of the AMA today. The BPL issue is a good example. Whether the AMA will be successful is another matter. If the AMA is not successful, and the 50 frequencies all become unusable IS an important CURRENT issue. It won’t be just AMA members that lose, it will be all modelers. So… rag on the AMA if you will, but, you darn well better be rooting for the AMA at the same time