NYYSR

Do you own a dynamometer? You claim that there is no drop in performance when that is literally impossible. I speak based upon facts (real world numbers) and not some "throttle finger dyno."

50 plus runs eh? Then you are truly lucky. Especially considering that you have a motor which has probably been advanced by twenty degrees not to mention that the brushes are about 3mm long.

As I previously stated replacement brushes are $3.

You obviously don't race your car nor do you have two years of testing to back you up. I have been testing 300 motors in race situations for the past two years. I have tested 188 speed 300 motors in the past two years. These motors have an average performance decrease of almost 9% after 10 five minute on the track runs!

Do you even have a 280 motor to compare to? The brushes on this motor are three times the length of the 300, the motor has more turns than a 300, draws less amps than a 300 (in its stock form) yet you still claim that the 300 motor will last longer. Then you claim that it costs less money to replace an entire tuned 300 motor than it does to replace brushes on a 280.[sm=confused.gif] Please explain this to me as well as everyone else here reading.

I am obviously a miseducated electrical engineer.