If I challange somebody's idea in a non-presonal way and they prove themself correct then it only makes their idea stonger.
My idea is that it is prudent to begin with a non-turbine glow engine aircraft. Electric park flyers are also a prudent choice. My idea is that if a beginner that has no prior RC flying experience asked what a good plane to learn on is and is told that he will be ok to learn with a turbine RC air craft, this advice is not wise to say the least.
Do you challenge this idea?