I HAVE TO SAY FIRST THAT I HAVE NNOOTTHHIINNGG against the AFP and the newest Relfex simulator. But I just have been on the AeroFly Pro's website and they say that their's is the best, because they have "real physics" to where the plane will act just, well almost like the real thing. Well, you have this great scenery, but you need to fly the plane right. I have been torque rolling the Cap 232 in G2, but you don't have large enough control surfaces to where you can't really control the roll rate. You just kinda hold it upright, and everything...and it torques around. Now, I dont' know about with the add-ons and stuff with the Extra 300 and stuff, but with AFP, then you have that Extra that Matt Roland (I believe) flew that comes with it............and I have seen the GREAT and INCREDIBLE video of that Extra flying and you have alot of control.................and also you can have a harrier just strait down like the REAL thing strait into a torque roll.......but on G2, then you can't do the harriers or anything, no matter how much deflection because you tipstall or whatever you call it, and you have no control.....


So, if AFP and Reflex really close to the real thing. I have seen the post that roarkr had up about the panoramic scenery like that and the video that is on the page when you open it up, and when he lands, it bounces and all......So, how "TRUE" to real flying is Reflex and AFP I have to ask.....??