RCU Forums - View Single Post - All this about Reflex, and AFP, but how "CLOSE" actually is it to PHYSICS??
Old 06-27-2004 | 02:23 AM
  #17  
iflynething
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC
Default RE: All this about Reflex, and AFP, but how "CLOSE" actually is it to PHYSICS??

ORIGINAL: Maudib

iflynething...

you do realize that those pics are not real planes but actual scr3enshots from Reflex XTR right? Just checking...

Also, you got me fired up again to record a video...

It's on the same page now...

http://renderwurx.com/rc/reflexxtr/

Yes, I did know that they were screenshots, but I just couldn't believe that they were. (I mean I know they were).......My mom didn't even believe when I showed her. She thought that they are from the real thing. I think the best (not to say that the otherone's aren't good) one is the one I believe at the bottom of that purple and white plane that looks like a Somethin' Extra (like my plane!!)....That really could go for the real thing anyday.


ORIGINAL: ptarp
Even though I will have fun with AFP, I'm very disapointed in the so-called "great physics engine". If reflex didn't force me to use my $400 transmitter all the time, I might consider it.



Also, I need to find out something. On AFP and Reflex, you have to turn ON YOUR TX. I hate that (not to say that I still dont' like them).....But, on G2 (I know I'm saying alot about G2, like i still like it the best, but I love AFP and Reflex) you don't have to turn it on. It gets the power from the computer, or through the interface or something.



I think that this is seemign to be a pretty interesting thread.........Well to me anyways.....