RCU Forums - View Single Post - All this about Reflex, and AFP, but how "CLOSE" actually is it to PHYSICS??
Old 06-27-2004 | 01:54 PM
  #19  
dhooks's Avatar
dhooks
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lake Butler , FL
Default RE: All this about Reflex, and AFP, but how "CLOSE" actually is it to PHYSICS??

No pissing match here, I'd love to love AFP, I just laid down $190 for it. I have flown a ucd .40 and a Funtana, and they both 3D(espescially elevator and harrier) WAY easier in AFP than on a real plane. I'm starting to sound like I don't like AFP, but I seriously do. I was just a bit disapointed after hearing so much amazing stuff about its flawless flight model.



I personally dont think that the ucd.46 or the funtana fly anything like the real thing. Rembember these are NOT models that ipacs included an have been tweaked to fly differently.....example : the funtana is around a 40% scale with the .40 size colouring scheme. So if it flys easier on AFP then your small model does in real life theres a reason. Hope you enjoy your AFP