RE: Update: AMA Safety and Accident Prevention Program
Excaliber,
Yes, I have met with Bill O. more than once, talked to him on the phone more than once, and even done business with him. So exactly what is your point?
Let me see if I understand your fine attitude correctly. It is your opinion that we should all shut up and just live with the fine examples of absolutely flawless AMA thinking as was demonstrated by Rule #9, THAT NO SINGLE EC MEMBER EVER VOTED FOR? By the way, that exclusion INCLUDES Bill O.
Unless I am mistaken, that rule was much more this year than it was last year. That makes my observations factual and the comments about next year reasonable given the FACTS. Care to argue that point, or just throw more rocks?
EXACTLY what is your problem?
Now back to the subject of the thread.
I figured out the only possible rule we could write to keep folks from putting body parts in spinning props. That is to stop flying model aircraft. If that is unacceptable, then we need to look at the number of rules in force to find out if we have overloaded folks. For example, why do we need to keep adding more and more things to the Safety Code? It is reasonably clear to me that the new additions don't create safety. Care to comment on that one, or just throw more rocks.