RCU Forums - View Single Post - Evolution 61
Thread: Evolution 61
View Single Post
Old 09-11-2004 | 05:20 AM
  #10  
DarZeelon's Avatar
DarZeelon
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Default RE: Evolution 61

Dave,


No, I am not!

Please reminisce on these threads about engine and prop balancing, in which even you took a part.

[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_1133499/anchors_1133499/mpage_1/key_prop%252Cbalance/anchor/tm.htm#1133499]Thread 1[/link].

[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_987339/anchors_987339/mpage_1/key_prop%252Cbalance/anchor/tm.htm#987339]Thread 2[/link].

[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_780489/anchors_780489/mpage_1/key_prop%252Cbalance/anchor/tm.htm#780489]Thread 3[/link].

[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_671471/mpage_2/key_prop%2Cbalance/tm.htm]Thread 4[/link].

[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_1393160/anchors_1393464/mpage_1/anchor/tm.htm#1393464]Post 1[/link].

I have said it all along.

A $20 magnetic/quad roller balancer is a waste of money, as you would not feel its contribution, over the fingertip balancer and not even over balancing the prop on a knife-edge.

This, unless you are running a horizontally opposed piston engine, with a 180 degree crankshaft (simultaneous firing two-stroke, or alternate firing four-stroke). In such engines, the primary vibration is canceled out and only second (and third) order vibration is perceivable. There, you might feel the advantage of a prop balanced on a more elaborate balancing device.