RE: Evolution 61
Dave,
No, I am not!
Please reminisce on these threads about engine and prop balancing, in which even you took a part.
[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_1133499/anchors_1133499/mpage_1/key_prop%252Cbalance/anchor/tm.htm#1133499]Thread 1[/link].
[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_987339/anchors_987339/mpage_1/key_prop%252Cbalance/anchor/tm.htm#987339]Thread 2[/link].
[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_780489/anchors_780489/mpage_1/key_prop%252Cbalance/anchor/tm.htm#780489]Thread 3[/link].
[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_671471/mpage_2/key_prop%2Cbalance/tm.htm]Thread 4[/link].
[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_1393160/anchors_1393464/mpage_1/anchor/tm.htm#1393464]Post 1[/link].
I have said it all along.
A $20 magnetic/quad roller balancer is a waste of money, as you would not feel its contribution, over the fingertip balancer and not even over balancing the prop on a knife-edge.
This, unless you are running a horizontally opposed piston engine, with a 180 degree crankshaft (simultaneous firing two-stroke, or alternate firing four-stroke). In such engines, the primary vibration is canceled out and only second (and third) order vibration is perceivable. There, you might feel the advantage of a prop balanced on a more elaborate balancing device.