This is a new topic, per instructions of the Moderator. How come it’s viewed as “an attack” on a Moderator, when their consistent poor grammar and spelling is merely pointed out? How come, when a Moderator “actively” participates in a post, he/she is allowed to change, delete, or end the post to benefit their position? Or, if their experience is questioned they end or delete the post, sighting it’s a “personal attack” toward them?
A good moderator should do their job, which is to reduce problems, regulate and control a post. This is a big reason why a moderator should not enter into (most) every post. As soon as the moderator enters the post he/she now becomes just another normal participant, and should not attempt to use their position to control the post. Furthermore, though insignificant in itself, the moderator has a duty toward professionalism and should strive to construct grammatically correct sentences. When this is not done, the Moderators’ high statue is relegated to just another “average Joe.”
Pete