You seem to be taking this personally, I can't see any place in the above posts where I attack you... obviously a miss understanding.
Never mind... the point is that the "fake" sites carry a great deal more convincing information than the "pro" sites. As people say, even Nasa.. when asked a question, don't seem to really answer it, they just go around the outside and accuse you of being "crazy" if you don't accept what they're saying. Think about this... how could they go to the moon... in 1968? With a 16k computer?

When asked about going back to the moon NASA states that the costs of developing the equipment is so prohibitive it dosn't make sense. But they already have the equipment... don't they? Tried and tested. I worked perfectly didn't it? Why change a winning team? Because they can't, even to this day, escape a low earth orbit. It's the radiation factor. Nasa addimitted that recently... it's been the cause of some serious humilliation for them. And yes, the scientific community agrees. Bummer!

So why would they need to fake it? It was the hight of the Cold War. These people weren't cheats, they were patriots doing what was deemed necessary. Great work indeed.