Bill, would you explain how my plane is like yours? They are both pseudo pod and boom from the side, but so are a lot of other Quickies.

Yes, I still have the kit you sent me, and it was a freebie, with nothing I was supposed to do in return.

I can lay my fuselage sides over yours, and there is no comparison. In fact my fuselage sides are closer to the NEME-Q than to your plane. And I never built your plane, but the formers don't match up to the top shape of my plane. It is entirely my own. Look at the inside back cover of the most recent Flying magazine at the Cirrus ad. You will see the shape of my fuselage in their logo. Mine is based on aerodynamic engineering and has been through over 40 revisions. There is a reason the nose is lowered slightly on my plane. Yours is not. Can you tell me why I did that?

The tail of my plane is closer to a Bird of Prey in shape.

And I don't remember any of your planes being engineered for a bolt on tail.

The wing on The Martin is an MH-18B, which you didn't design. One of my friends was using that wing before you were. It's a nice forgiving airfoil, but not quite as fast as some others.

>> Nobody else cuts a fuse and wing cores like that except for me and the person that told me that I should be cutting my wings like this! <<

That means your plane isn't actually your own design then. And if that person had the knowledge about how fuselages should be designed, do you think he had an exclusive on it?

You shouldn't be pissed. You have no reason to be. I on the other hand do, so leave it alone, or be gone. You are crossing over into the personal attack zone, and I will not tolerate that here.