RCU Forums - View Single Post - JPO Proposal
Thread: JPO Proposal
View Single Post
Old 08-29-2002 | 05:39 PM
  #31  
BernieG
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Broken Arrow, OK
Default JPO Proposal

Originally posted by klenker
I would, however sign them off after seeing them fly a Top Flite 1/5 scale P-51 or almost any of the Ziroli warbirds, because I know from experience that they are as difficult to fly safely as my 'Roo - even if they don't go 150 MPH.
Hum, the AMA text found here http://www.modelaircraft.org/templat...-files/538.pdf says explicitly that the model should have flaps, but does not talk about retracts.

I don't have experience with a big warbird, but is not the difficulty linked directly to their weight ? Any very heavy plane is difficult to fly safely, no matter which speed it is able of ( When I say heavy, I should say heavy wing loading, as the absolute weight don't matter much), so the criteria the AMA should insist upon is wing loading and complexity (retracts, flaps), as that is what make a jet more difficult than anything else, and the closest planes from that definition are still ducted fan !

Bernard
PS- What I mean is a light Mustang, regardless to its size, is a *****cat. Now, an heavy Mustang will want to snap on you as soon as you begin to relax a tid bit....