RCU Forums - View Single Post - PERFORMANCE ADVANTAGE GWS DRAGONFLY DIRECT DRIVE/VS/GEAR DRIVE?
Old 12-21-2004, 07:25 PM
  #8  
quaker1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: PERFORMANCE ADVANTAGE GWS DRAGONFLY DIRECT DRIVE/VS/GEAR DRIVE?

There is a Dragonfly with both shaft driven tail and collective pitch, its the 22a,

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...sPageName=WDVW

like I said basically shaft=better control/response vs
second motor=more robust but not good on FP helis at best, plus prone to tail wag due to slow motor speed up/slow down time.

If you are talking about a motor on the tail then I would say the smaller rotor with direct drive, it has a quicker spin-up time and a quicker slow-down time plus the rotors are cheaper and I beleive stronger. The added weight of the bigger motor is nearly offset by the weight of the parts you dont need, two bearings, reduction gear, shaft and bigger rotor.