RCU Forums - View Single Post - Three blade VS. Two blade
View Single Post
Old 12-26-2004 | 09:59 PM
  #30  
Lowlevlflyer
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Davis, OK
Default RE: Three blade VS. Two blade

Yeah, I know... some people just cant be convinced without taking them up and making them spit their lunch all over the instrument panel!![:'(]

ORIGINAL: Jeepindog

ORIGINAL: Lowlevlflyer

Being a full scale pilot as well as a beginner in R/C, I can tell you this... ALL of the fastest and most maneuverable full scale single engine aircraft run three bladed props: V-35 and A-36 Bonanza, Cessna Centurion, Piper Malibu Mirage, Piper Lance, not to mention all the higher end Aerobatic craft like the Sukhoi, Edge, Extra, most of the Pitts, CAP, the list goes on. i've flown a tad over 3,000 hours, and around 1,000 hours of that in 450 and 600hp B model Ag Cats, and the ones I've flown with three blade prop conversions ALWAYS performed better... higher cruise speed, lower fuel burn, less noise, and a shorter take off roll with a heavy load.
But no one will believe it... Or they will tell you that you obviously had more power available, so the manufacturer should have spec'd that airframe with a bigger two-blade prop in the first place, or they had the wrong pitch...

Lachlan