RCU Forums - View Single Post - CM Pro ? good/ bad/ ugly ?
View Single Post
Old 02-10-2005 | 01:20 AM
  #6  
forestroke's Avatar
forestroke
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Taipei, TAIWAN
Default RE: CM Pro ? good/ bad/ ugly ?

I have had many of their ARF's as well, the Baby Cap232 and Cessna (red version) and still have their Yak 54 140 NIB. Both planes were nice but the Cessna needed a little time in assembly as LuckyArmpit already stated.

They are generally good planes though a little on the heavy side. The Cessna with a 61 fourstroke wasn't by any means powerful and needed a little dive to get it around a larger loop. But it is a scale plane with scale characteristics.

The Cap232 with the 32SX was great but not a 3D machine.

Yak 54 looks great and seems to have great quality BUT many have said that it is much too heavy for 3D as well.

Overall I give them a buy with care rating. They are good but require a little love during assembly and while fly fine, may not be as aerobatic as you expect.