RCU Forums - View Single Post - anyone know zero lift angle difference between HQ2.5/8.5 and HQ2.5/9 ?
Old 02-17-2005 | 07:37 PM
  #5  
Tall Paul
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Palmdale, CA
Default RE: anyone know zero lift angle difference between HQ2.5/8.5 and HQ2.5/9 ?

ORIGINAL: BMatthews

OK, now I'm a bit confused. Paul, from the first chart it seems to indicate that the zero lift angle changes as the Reynolds number changes. It also shows that as the Reynolds number drops (either due to speed decreasing or chord becoming smaller) that the lift coefficient changes. That seems a bit odd to me. I would have thought that a zero lift angle of attack would remain constant with speed. Explanations anyone?

Hai Dang, I know this stuff is hard to pick up but if you're going to use it to design a better glider then you really need to get to understand it better. It's a long and rocky road but just when you're feet feel like they've been chewed off up to the ankles it'll suddenly all make some sense.
.
??? the zero lift angle -is- a function of Re...
Most of us old guys haven't played with data down in the mud where toy airplanes fly.. and Re effects are substantial..
F'r instance, this SD-7032 shows a marked effect of Re on zero lift, in the low Re numbers models use.
Our bible, NACA 824 never got that low in Re investigations. 632-415 for example.. Re typically at 6,000,000
and the 0006, at many Res..
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ca83090.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	91.8 KB
ID:	230794   Click image for larger version

Name:	Je10868.gif
Views:	109
Size:	92.5 KB
ID:	230795   Click image for larger version

Name:	Yv66198.gif
Views:	183
Size:	125.2 KB
ID:	230796