All I was wanting to see is what difference the results of the test would be if the fuel baseline were changed. Not everyone is going to run 10% in their engines. Why not run a set of figures for 10%,20%, and 30%. It would not make the results any less accurate. It would actually show the characteristics of each specific engine better. I was refering to horizon's test of the satio 100 for two reasons:

First to say that I like the format of the test better because of the use of mutliple baseline fuels.

Second to show the significant increases available to anyone if they just changed the percent of nitro in their satios. I have noticed a difference in the behavior of the engine and power with just a increase to 20% nitro by using Powermaster YS 20/20 blend fuel.

I was not trying to say to take horizon's tests as fact because I too realize the test might be biased toward satio because horizon markets them.