ORIGINAL: abel_pranger
The essence of it is, how does AMA rationalize giving themselves the option to walk away from liability risk at an event site that may arise from activities not allowed by their own rules and assessment of risk, absolve themselves of the responsibility for anything that may happen outside the 'official events' time frame but still within the overall time frame of the sanction, and knowing that the site owner has no such option?
[Abel
I guess post #18 is not clear. The landlord has 24 hours of coverage on the date of the sanction.. period.
It is NOT subjet to the comings and goings of the CD. It is NOT subject to the safety code. It is NOT subject to the sanction being in place.