ORIGINAL: abel_pranger
ORIGINAL: J_R
You're more of a lawyer than I am. I have no idea about the factual details of the SFA/AMA suit, and I don't really care. I also don't know what coverage the AMA has or does not have, and I don't really care.
I will take your leave
Sorry you've decided to bow out of
your discussion. If you care to continue it without me, please do and be assured that I won't interrupt.
As for the parting shot, any notion that casts me as bearing any resemblance to a lawyer is patently absurd. I have other hobbies that make me likely prey to their deprivations. They are my enemy. The causal form of reason that their institution is based on is foreign to me and makes me uncomfortable, as my familiar world functions on logical reason. What little I know of the craft they have so miserably corrupted for their own illicit gain has been acquired in the spirit of "Know Thine Enemy."
Abel
Please excuse my attitude about lawsuits and the discussion of them. I am a firm believer that anyone can sue for anything. I am sure you could make some case that the AMA is an agent for the NAA and that they could also be sued. Perhaps there are grounds to sue the FAA. I really don't care and will leave it for the tort system to sort out. If you wish to speculate, I have no problem with that.
My concerns lie with actions that affect the general membership in a somewhat more direct way. Continue on, just don't expect me in the debate. I am sure others have thoughts.