I Hope you dotn think I was bashing your post because I assumed you didnt know what you were talking about. Quite the contrary I was definatly misunderstanding you when you talked about torque and holding power in the same sentance. I do not believe that torque and holding power in a servo are the same. Holdng power has nothing to do with the torque out put of the servo. But it does have to do with the gear make up MG vs plastic. You stated that I said "However, I totally disagree about gear train makup. Torque delivered has zippo to do with gear train material." I said noting of that, I do not think torque has anything to do with gear train make up. However I do think it hasa somehting to do with holding power which I stated and still believe that torque and holding power in servos are totally different. In short I think we are both saying the same thing here an just misinturpiting one another. I also never stated the gear train does or doesnt affect back lash all I stated was the benifits of a cheaper digital servo vs an anolog. IMO if you dare not going to use std 3004 or 3003 and need to upgrade these are the best bang for your buck. I agree with going to a 6v battery however. While there may not be negative recourse for using one to the other there is prefrence and IMO 6V far outweighs a 4.8 if they drain the same you are only gainning extra speed and torque which is sometimes required. If I was to need a 75 oz servo and I had 2 choices ditch the 4.8 pack and get e 6v or swap out all my current servos to get ones with that rating at 4.8 I am buying a 6v battery. Clearly we have 2 opionins based on the exact same facts. I didnt intend to make this a debate but to more clarify so there was no confusion.