RCU Forums - View Single Post - New ABC...sloppy rich running
View Single Post
Old 04-14-2005 | 11:16 AM
  #15  
piper_chuck's Avatar
piper_chuck
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Columbia, SC
Default RE: New ABC...sloppy rich running

ORIGINAL: DarZeelon
If I understand this correctly, the settings above are in order of richness; from the richest mixture to the leanest (not including a damaging lean-run...).

If so, what is described here as 'FOUR CYCLING or SLIGHTLY RICH', is not what I mean when I talk about four-cycling, in which the engine actually fires on alternate revolutions.

This will actually happen when the mixture is 'RICH', or even on when 'SLOPPY RICH'.
I agree that K&B's description of the term four cycling appears to be different that other (most?) people's use of the word. However, I don't see it as very relevant, because the instructions don't use the term four cycling, they use the term slightly rich. When you read the description of slightly rich, without fixating on the term four cycling, it's pretty clear that they meant the backed off from peak setting, that sport fliers (the ones who want their engines to last) use.

Most sport fliers I know don't set their engines for absolute peak, this is an area of performance that's usually only needed for people who race, or feel the need for speed, and are willing to pay the price of buying replacement parts or engines. They also don't try to fly at a setting that you would call four cycling. They usually fly at a slightly rich setting.