RE: SFA History
That's a downright INSANE revision of history. It's like Holocaust deniers and such.
106 has a BIG grudge against AMA and Dave Brown, always has, so everything gets twisted into anti-AMA screed. It becomes tiresome.
"Wally was NOT involved in anything that had to do with AMA, SFA or the club and the AMA"
WRONG. On the payroll of SFA, along with other family members.
He also transferred the assets of SFA to her, in an attempt to dodge the judgement.
Revenge? Guess who paid the legal bills from the bogus lawsuit SFA filed?
I did. All AMA members did.
Guess who made money off of it? Elliot and his family. Screw THAT.
SFA could write any old policy they wanted, because THE POLICY WAS WORTHLESS.
I have never seen ONE claim paid. Not ONE. You can toss around all the pieces of paper you want, it don't mean nuthin until someone actually files a claim. I have NEVER EVER EVER heard of ONE SFA claim paid. I have heard of a few denied. On the other hand, I know about hundreds of AMA claims paid.
F106 is really typical of the "opposition". Guys with some long standing grudge against AMA because DAve Brown took their favorite parking spot back in 1978 or something. Then EVERYTHING Ama does is somehow twisted into an evil conspiracy.
Look at that other thread...a newsletter comes back misadressed, and therefore they are calling for the ouster of a VP. How clueless is this?
The whole story above is so far from reality, it's painful to read.
For once, I have to support something Red Schoenfeld said, his post is pretty much right on, maybe he can continue the story, and maybe attribute it to the correct source, as I do beleive that person published it very publicly...
I've had enough. Bye.