This post is just my opinion, and not directly related to the specific topic.

If anyone has ever been in a lawsuit, the only thing you can be assured of is that the parties to the suit, and their attorneys, are the only ones that have a clue as to what really transpired. Reading legal complaints and the legal answers to those complaints gives only the point of view of those preparing the legal documents. Even access to depositions and/or testimony assumes the honesty of the individuals giving the deposition or testimony. I have been involved in enough lawsuits to believe that when the very existence, financial or otherwise, of a being, real or corporate, is at stake, that doubt is the only realistic stance for an outsider.

It also seems to me that when an organization’s prime motive is to turn a profit for the owners, its motives are different than those of a charity where the assets of the charity may be owned by no one, but, that is just my opinion (notwithstanding claims by some that those in charge of a charity intend to run off with the assets of the charity).

We can argue and squabble, but the truth will elude debate, IMO. It’s pretty unlikely that the principals actually involved in the case will come forward and present their views. All we will ever see is the tip of the iceberg, with the body remaining forever undiscovered.

Note the date this thread began.