As previsously discussed;

..........begin to lose the debate on facts, go after the individual.

Jim, Your memory doens't serve you well. Your selective memory is mixing up completely different issues.

For the record, there were no "legal happenings" related to the incident you reference and my apology was sincere, to one individual and certainly was not, "forced". It involved an email exchange within the board, not a forum website....... some 3 years ago Jim. Water that has long gone under the bridge and made it to the ocean.

Let's stay on track. I will admit to being the "evil one" with a "666" tatooed to the back of my head and yeah, the mounties showed up at my door and hauled me off in irons for offences related to anti-MAAK propoganda crimes......I am living in great shame with a MAAK electronic braclet around my ankle so I can be constantly tracked....

.......now that we have established what a terrible person I am, can we stick to the issue, which.......by the way was about lack of traffic, not whether or not certain individuals should be allowed to use the internet.