Man I cant imagine how you can see G3 being anywhere close to AFPD in realism. I can fly pretty doggone solid 3D and I just could not get a realistic sense from Real Flight anything for hovering harriers or any of that, even playing with the physics I couldnt find a realistic feel. I must have missed something but having tried both brands I just absolutely cannot see it. In less than 6 months with AFPD I went from a novice 3D hole burnertry to learn 3D and not crash to a guy that can hang with any above average 3D RC pilot out there. Thats an honestly true statement.
Proof of what AFPD has done for me since December..

http://videos.pitsbros.com/MikesFlightVid7-23-05.wmv

I dont know Kyle Woyshnis personally, but Im really honestly shocked that he would have said he prefers G2 considering what an awesome pilot he is. Hmmm,,,, however, that being said I think he could precisely 3D my computer monitor if I strapped a DA50 to it.