[sm=confused.gif]

Huh? I didn't read that in Ron's post, The way I understood it, he's simply commenting on what he's observed....

I really don't get the dome being attributed to Ronnie either ... why are you picking on my buddy again?[sm=punching.gif][sm=lol.gif]

=========================

adaptabl said it best "The problem is the club in the next city may not be safe and we will all suffer."

I'll only add that I fear more for some of the rogue flyers I've seen. Flying in an uncontrolled public area with zero crowd control is begging for a major incident.[:@]

If you continue to put more restrictive rules you in place, you will only be penalizing the safe flyers (and push some into rebellion).

I think a good analogy would be with security. "Locks only deter honest people". to paraphrase "rules only regulate safe people". It's the unsafe that are the real issue, and these can only be addressed through education ... and then not all will respond.[]

Should our safety committee be concentrating more on education than continuously revising rules?