RE: Magazines say there are no bad planes??
To add a bit:
In another thread on a similar subject (well, the same actually!) Someone mentioned that you'll rarely see a 'bad review' as the reviewer will work with the manufactrurer to correct the mistakes / flaws he's found. Basically, the reviewer is the last 'beta builder' for them.
With the flaws corrected, the reviewer does a new evaluation, and bases the report on that.
In all, we all win. But the reviews will always praise.
Or, is this a sign of our times? That we like to see (and 'get off') on watching others fail? And we want to see / read about some-one elses failure to meet expectations