RCU Forums - View Single Post - four star 120
View Single Post
Old 11-13-2005 | 10:18 PM
  #8  
BobbyGee's Avatar
BobbyGee
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Round Rock, TX
Default RE: four star 120


ORIGINAL: rcdude7

The zenoah is more expensive than any of the other weedie type engines in the 25cc class. It is also a good bit more powerful too. The boost port in the G-26 cylinder is what gives it such a advantage over the G-23 and other engines with tranfer ports only. I think it out run the toro by 1000 rpm give or take a little. I tached my box stock G-26 yesterday and got 8700 with a 17X8 prop.
The toro is a fine engine as long as you don't require power of the G-26


No question about the greater power of the Zenoah. What has me looking at the Toro conversion is the fact that for a sport flyer that doesn't need more than run of the mill power, the savings is worth it.

If I were looking at a competition plane, or an aggressive acrobat, I would be looking at top of the line engines.

For a more basic kind of flying I think a good conversion is appropriate technology.

BobbyG