Originally posted by J_R
Bill
Can I then assume that YOU do not know IF Sandy Frank had all the information and that YOU THINK that his only purpose was to enhance the HQ effort?
JR
JR;
You can assume anything you want (and you probably will! :-( )
Since I do not know what "information" you think he SHOULD have had, I can not say if he had it or not. And besides, it really doesn't make any difference!
And you need NOT assume anything about his purpose: as I SAID in my first response, JR:
" > ...It was posted to r.m.r.a
> to widen the distribution, and perhaps to an audience more inclined to
> participate in internet-based activities such as was requested in the
> AMA article(s)...."
(That was Sandy's response when I asked him!)
No ASSUMPTIONS needed, JR
Now, I'll ask this same question of YOU for the THIRD time, JR: why continue beating this issue to death when it is definitely water under the bridge?
Regards,
Bill Lee