RCU Forums - View Single Post - tail dragger or tricycle??
View Single Post
Old 01-05-2006 | 07:56 PM
  #15  
britbrat
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Default RE: tail dragger or tricycle??

ORIGINAL: rcandy

Lowlevlflyer,

Not to be argumentative......and I don't mean to be, but flying a taildragger......that is taking
off and landing a taildragger..........is not a pre-conceived notion that it is a handful.

---- I still think the best advice for beginners is definitely a tricycle landing gear, high wing trainer.

Respectfully,
Andy
I respectfully agree -- in general. Once the student has mastered the basics of flying & ground handling with a trike, the transition to a dragger is generally easier that struggling with one right off the bat. He/she is no longer all wound up about the mechanics of flight -- just scared stiff about the take-off.

However, the trouble with generalities is that they are generalities -- with a gazillion exceptions. There are 'draggers from hell & 'draggers that are a piece of cake.

Generally converted trainers aren't a huge problem -- the large tail moment helps to tame them, so the transition from a Superstar trike to a Superstar 'dragger is pretty simple.

Other planes, like warbirds for example, are an entirely different matter & the transition from a Superstar trike to a Spitfire is quite hellacious, without regard to actually flying the Spit.

Similarly, there is a gigantic variation in natural tallent & reflexive response on the part of the pilots -- some hardly notice the 'dragger problems & some never get over them.

All things considered, I generally prefer students to take their lumps first with a trike -- not that trikes are faultless.