Ann, I have the Pitts Biplane. I too agree it is a marvelous plane. I have had both of the described problems happen on my plane. It was first flown with a ST 3250 (which is in the engine size range) but felt it was not enough power to fly the bird like the real one flies. I have seen the real one fly, and it does fly fast, and maneuver every quickly. Lost the top wing in flight because of the front screws being to close to the edge (I wasn't aware of the problem until after it happened). I was just very glad that I managed to get it down reasonably safe.

I did repair the damage, and beefed up the areas that had caused the mishap. Installed blind nuts behind the screws for added security. I am also flying it with a smoke system. with the added realism of the smoke, and the added weight associated with it, the ST 3250 just isn't enough motor. So, I installed a G62 to even things out. I must also point out, that I like many other modelers, with larger engines in their planes, don't fly straight and level, or down lines, full throttle. The extra power is for the vertical maneuver's. Still I suffered the brackets breaking once on mine.

I use flying wires, stiffened the landing gear on it as well, to carry the additional weight, double check everything before and after every flight, and try not to take un-needed risks. The air frame it very strong and durable, as most everyone will acknowledge to.

We are not knocking the design of the model. We, as modelers, have found a few areas (the offset holes, and the bracket breakage) that troubles us. So, I would like to think that we are bringing this to Great Planes attention, in hopes of maybe offering ideas of how to improve an already marvelous model.

I am presently looking into finding a nylon type of material in a "T" shape configuration of about 1" in length. I believe a semi flexible material would all but eliminate this troubled spot. I would also appreciate any of your thoughts on this as well.

Best regards Ricky Rocket