I'll be first in line to try it when it comes out, but I could give a crap how it looks. Obviously it looks good enough to teach a person how to fly.

How does it fly is the real question. Microsoft Flight Flight Sim is living proof that you can add all the fluff and bells and whistles in the world, but you can't make it fly for crap no matter how many billions you have sitting in the bank. In fact Microsoft is so gung ho to keep it's online play that it would rather keep the physics down to support online play then to make it FAA approved like XPlane. The problem is that there are more suckers in the world then pilots would use it for training. Sucks because it's a great simulator for IFR training and to stay fresh, but it's physics annoys the hell out of me.

As far as price goes, again, doesn't matter to most people who invest thousands into their toys, including myself. A simulator should represent simulation no matter what. Otherwise it's just an RC game and priced accordingly. If it's priced lower there is a reason for it. Price is set by market demand.