RCU Forums - View Single Post - G3 multiplayer screenshots
View Single Post
Old 01-27-2006 | 12:53 PM
  #126  
50%plane's Avatar
50%plane
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: California
Default RE: G3 multiplayer screenshots


ORIGINAL: Rick Delten


ORIGINAL: STLPilot

Rick you think I'm trying to start trouble and I'm not. You seem to be going from one extreme to the other extreme and we can't meet in the middle. As much as you like and enjoy reproducing other manufacturers models and schemes you still have to respect their concerns as well. You don't have to quit modeling just over a simple request like asking for a plug for use of shape.

The reason that I asked you to put the FlyingThingZ URL on your mower was only because if someone else saw it and didn't know that FlyingThingZ existed ... they may like it and copy it or do something else with it. With the URL on there the chances are very unlikely. Nobody is trying to make trouble for you, only you. The digital world is changing the way things get copied, it's making it very easy to replicate and take what does not belong to you. If you modeled your mower from the AFPD mower ... then guess what ... it's modeled from the exact CADS. Capice?

If you don't like the fact that manufacturers are coming down on you for replicating their models or schemes without a simple courtesy phone call or permission it's not that you are doing something wrong, not us. We want you to use our models. Heck only 48 hours I gave Jim Bourke permission to use and OMP or FlyingThingZ plane for G3 and he was very happy about that. I only asked that he clearly plugged FTZ or OMP for the use there of.

And this crap about Fokkers, Edges, Extras and other planes I could care less Prop Nut. Those are not my models, your just being a wise guy.

But you guys might be really surprised to know that there are court battles going on from companies like Republic, American and Northrup suing diecast companies and other companies for use of the warbirds. It's getting ugly since the taxpayers were the ones that funded the planes in the first plance. But it just goes to show you that it's not always take take take. And your analogies like use of the NYC skyline is much different.
Capice? What are you Tony freakin Soprano now??

So your saying that my trimschemes/planes are in fact illegal to make and distribute, dispite the fact that I will not make a single dime?

Are you the same [link=http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:LQZtNeyoKD4J:the.honoluluadvertiser .com/article/2002/Mar/12/tc/tc03a.html+dion+cini&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5]Dion Cini[/link] that stated publically...

But officials at one site, St. Louis-based CopyMyDVD.com, said they are doing nothing wrong. Consumers have the right to copy their DVDs for personal use under the 1992 Home Audio Recording Act, CopyMyDVD spokesman Dion Cini said.

Cini also said duplicated DVDs are inferior to the original copies in terms of image and sound quality, so they should be exempt from laws protecting DVDs.

"We are not making an exact replica of a DVD," he said. "It's not a complete and legitimate product."


I think you are, and if I am right wouldn't that make you the worlds largest hypocrite?

LOL

STL, if you want to defend this, I'm all ears.(or eyes in this case) If not, please leave my thread alone.(place meanspirited word here)


Woops

BTW, check out the new sig