R/C Report is ok in my opinion no better than any other mag out there. There last review on the h9 Sukio could have been done at least by someone with aerobatic experience. This is a plane that was made for unlimited aerobatics and should have in my opinion been reviewed that way. the flight report states that the pilot is not an acomplished aerobatic pilot but some day hopes to be. If I wanted to know how a sukoi flew around the pattern I can imagine what that would be like... I do not need someone to tell me that. on the other hand If the reviewer were to get an acomplished pilot in aerobatics to do that portion of the flight testing in my mind would have been wise. I could review a jet and say man is that fast and handles like it is on rails means nothing to anyone because I have never flown a jet. It could go 75<MPH and by my standards that is fast, But to a Jet Jock they would say it could not get out of its own way. I take reviews with a grain of salt and now before I purchase a model (i like arfs no time) I download the instruction manual and read it in its entirty before purchasing. Now that I have found RCuniverse I will also do some reaserch on this site. But, I do not trust the opinons of most reviewers In particular those in MAN but R/C Report and others are no better, although I do belive R/C Report to be more Honest and MAN more manufacture driven.