What pis''''' me is 99% of all the articles, where ever they come from tend to be construction based...even when it's a AFTF. Detailed accounts how they joined the wing????... wonderfull references to how the instruction included a box to tick of as you do each stage?????, how easily the cowl was trimmed???? and 1 million other trinckets of irrelivence!!!!!!!!!! page after page.
Then at last the flying of which if you analyse the 10 zillion reports aways concludes in
"exceptionally well." We'll in my opinion thats exceptional rubbish. I have people turning up with all sorts of aeroplanes and asking for help... advice...can you show me how to do this and that.
These are people that fly well but they just can't be helped because the aeroplanes they have are basically dreadful. They fly, period. Guys with kyosho this or that...flashy eye candy...man if these people are going to get on the learning curve they'ed be better of with a Coas or Tiger.
All aeroplanes fly but they sure don't fly equally well. Say this in a test report... a kiss good by the the ad-spend. There's the answer.

Even if you answer a post in these forums when an obvious rookie(ish) ask how a perticular model fly's and you answer "in my oppinion badly" You'll get 30 replys from other rookies saying "well I been flying for 3 years and I think it's great so go for it!"
Hummmm never mind.