Actually I understood your post just fine, it being one similar to many on RCU. That is (1) it contains opinions about the accuracy of a product review and the "hundreds" of failed airframes (2) posting on RCU only exhibits ones' opinion for those to agree or disagree with.

Based on my personal experience with the Sig Sukhoi, the direct contact I have had with other owners and Sig Manufacturing, I choose to agree with the review.

And it is correct in that this series of posts is about MAN (or other publications) possibly being too chummy with advertisers to print objective reviews. Again, my position is evaluate the reviews for the information they contain, research the product for yourself and base a purchase decision on your own judgement.

Lastly, write comments directly to MAN, or any other publication with personally questionable reviews.They all value the reader's opinion, good or bad.