ORIGINAL: ballgunner
One of the worst was item D under New Business. Who ever dreamed that one up should be have his AMA membership card suspended for at least 12 months if not for life. I have read the entire program report and have never seen such a misguided, (I'm being kind here) bunch of c**p being put forward by people elected to govern any organization. Item 5 under motions approved by acclamationis is another thing that should be at least brought to the attention of the average AMA member for input. At this point the AMA EC is a plan conceived by geniuses to be executed by idiots. The meeting minutes prove that.
I am absolutely amazed that Fred McClellan, AKA "the-plumber", was able to hold his temper after seeing your post.
Just my opinion, but I doubt that you have any idea of what you are talking about.
Fred is responsible for item D under new business. His effort, in my opinion, may be the most important effort to reach out to potential modelers that the AMA has made in years. The motion, as presented by Stillman and Mathewson is posted here:
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=470067
I just very much doubt you have ever seen it before and I think, if that is the case, you owe Fred one huge apology. If not, some explanation on your part is due.
As to the other item, the frequency committee was TASKED with the development of a system. It has not done so yet and if you have input, why not direct it to the frequency committee? The membership of that committee is in the Member's Only section on the AMA site.
This item was on the agenda, giving you time to have had your input previously. It was item A under New Business. Waiting till after the meeting has passed and complaining, when you had time before the meeting makes little sense... at least to me.
JR