RCU Forums - View Single Post - Comparing engine performance?
View Single Post
Old 03-03-2006 | 07:24 AM
  #36  
B.L.E.'s Avatar
B.L.E.
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: Comparing engine performance?


ORIGINAL: DarZeelon


ORIGINAL: DarZeelon

...If 'chump' is getting 40,000; 'champ' would be doing 44,208 RPM, by your numbers...
And Brian,


Using this 'identical prop load' example; this 10.5% increase in RPM, would still require over 22% increase in the torque, from an engine which is already close to being optimized, right out-of-the-box...

I refuse to believe this is possible, without a 'different' supercharging apparatus.

I think that the main reason that pylon racing .40s are not tuned to be optimized at these rpms is not so much the mechanical limits of the engines but because of the exponential nature of prop load. At 44K, you would probably have to use a 1/2A size prop on a .40 and the reduced propulsion efficiency would likely cancel the gains of the extra power.
Big props turning low rpms tend to have higher propulsion efficiencys than tiny props at super high rpm, hence the popularity of gear reduction for electrics. With glow engines, the best prop is a tradeoff between engine power and propulsion efficiency.