![]() |
Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I mainly fly 3d profiles and heli's but i really like the looks of this plane. I have plenty of 3 cell 3300mah batts which should work. They are a bit heavier than the reccomended setup but with such low winglaoding I think the plane could handle the extra weight. Also the motor I want to use is about 1 ounce heavier than the reccomended but is capable of delivering 500+ watts. I am sure I will be able to get it to balance with the big battery I want to use. Does anyone see any reason why this would not work? I will be using HS-55's all the way around which I think will be ok as I do not plan on putting huge 3d throws in this plane. I want it more for precision flying with some mild 3d. Also if anyone has seen this plane in person or heard anything about it other than what is on tower's site please let me know.
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I have first-hand experience with the reactor bipe and I can tell you it is really a sweet flying airplane. As with anything it's better at certain maneuvers than others, but I don't think you'll hear any complaints for what it is... I think people will be very pleasantly surprised. With good servos and the right prop it is a rock-solid harrier machine.
I think your setup will work, but you can expect to add some tail weight in order to get it to balance. The recommended 35-36-1200 GP Rimfire motor weighs 3.6oz and the GP 2100mAh 3S LiPo weighs 6.2oz. These together get the plane in perfect balance, so consider that with the batts and motor you have. For those who have reservations because of landing gear issues and stabs breaking on the monoplane EP reactor, don't fret - both the gear and the tail have been updated on this plane and it is considerably stonger than the monoplane. As for the build, nothing really to look out for except that you should be careful to orient your interplane struts properly (TF goes to Top, Front). ESC installation takes a bit of fishing but keeps it out of the way and leaves the batt compartment clear. Anyway, hope this helps! Steve |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Steve thanks for theinformation i have not started assembling my bipe reactor yet but i will start this week. I never knew there were any problems with the mono wing reactor. The guys i fly with have really wrung mine out. I hope to have mine ready in the next week or so. What prop are you using?
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
No problem Zac, glad to offer my 2 cents on the subject. I'm using the APC 10x5 prop for now which matches my "sport" pilot flying abilities. The all-around favorite should be the APC 10x7. The 11x7 adds more bite for 3D while keeping much of the speed the 10x7 offers. I haven't tried it yet, but I'd like to try the APC 11x5.5 which should offer plenty of thrust while keeping the plane in "low gear."
The original EP reactor was a hit or miss for people I knew. Some had no problems while some experienced all of the problems! As you may know, there's not much holding the landing gear plate on the plane and grass landings eventually rip it off. The horizontal stabs have broken on some planes b/c the balsa is 3mm thick and you have to very carefully trim off the covering from the stab ctr section before you glue it into the plane. You just can't help but score the wood in the process. Before you know it, your stab breaks. My best advice is to use plenty of thin CA to strengthen that area on your mono reactor. The new bipe uses 4mm wood and uses a hardwood spar in the stab. Also, the covering is not trimmed.... the factory uses a jig to apply it in the right spot so no knife blades contact the wood at any time. Anyway, I hope you enjoy the plane! Let us know what you think. |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I flew the Reactor Bipe for the first time last evening and it is a sweet airplane. Here's how I outfitted it: 2808/20 AXI outrunner motor, 30 Amp Jeti speed control, True R/C 2100 3 cell lipo, and 8x6 APC thin electric prop. The plane weighs 36 ounces with battery. At full throttle, I'm pulling 29 amps and 351 watts which translates into 142 watt lbs. I have it set on low rates for sport flying and the control throws are quick. I had to add 30% expo to aileron and elevator. This will become one of my favorite planes!!
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
how do u know what % value expo/dual-rates to use? is it basically trial-n-error? i own the typhoon2 3d and recently bought a new tx/rx to replace the rtf tx/rx which had expo built-in already. thanks in advance
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
On a Futaba system...I think 25%-35% would be a good place to start.
Is one of those things that need to be tailored to your own desired feel. Remember....on Futaba...it should be a negative value...and on the other brand the settings may be a positive value. Don't be scared...Expo is your friend! cheers George |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
so i have the spektrum dx6i
should be positive right? thanks for telling me. man, i dont like learnign things the hard way at all [8D] |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Dual rates are in the manual of most models. With Spektrum radios, expo is positive rather than negative. Start out at about 30% and see how it feels. You can always add or subtract from there. Remember, the more positive expo, the less sensitive the controls will feel around neutral.
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
thanks! i recently discovered how to adjust control stick tension so in addition to expo, i'll have an uber controllable setup:D
great tips, great tips... thanks again |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
so i am just using D/R + expo the following:
high rate Aeileron 100% + 30% Elevator 100% + 30% Rudder 100% + 30% low rate Aileron 50% + 30% Elevator 50% + 30% Rudder 50% + 30% Does this look about right? |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Yep, that looks good. Try the sticks and see how you like the feel. You can always increase or reduce expo.
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I also have this plane. I went with the rimfire thats recommended. According to the great planes rep, an 11x7 E prop works perfect.
Its one of the prettiest covering jobs I've seen. Great color combination. The control surfaces are very large therefore, not much deflection is needed for the plane to rip up the sky. As far as expo to use, I'd start with 50%. I have the futaba 9c so I can blend in quite a few settings. I also asked the rep about the landing gear. Basically, I told him why do model companies assume that everyone flies off of a paved runway? There are many of us who fly off of a grass runway. He assured me that the wood structure was much better than previous models. We shall see. I only use at minimum 2 inch foam wheels because smaller diameter ones get stuck on my field. Lucky... |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Just bought the power system for my future Reactor Bipe, hope it works good and any input/suggestions are appreciated.
I wanted to go with a motor that won't leave me yearning for more power as I get used to its characteristics and start doing a little 3d'ing, so I just picked up an E-Flite Power15, 950kv. With the plane weighing around 36oz/2.25lbs I got these figures on motor watts and watts per pound: With plane weight @ 36oz. @9.9volts & 34A = 336watts = 149.6 watts per pound @9.9volts & 42A = 415.8watts= 184.8 watts per pound With plane weight @ 38oz. 9.9volts & 34A = 336watts = 141.72 watts per pound 9.9volts & 42A = 415.8watts = 175 watts per pound For an ESC I picked up the Thunderbird 54. This might bite me in the butt later on, allowing a little more amps going to the motor than the motor is rated for. The Power 15 motor is rated for 42A max burst, and this ESC allows 54A max. I'm using FP EVO25 2170mah 3s & TP 2100mah 15c 3s batteries. I had 4 Spektrum 75 digital servos, 19oz/in torque @ .11 sec. speed. I think i'll try the 10x7 APC at first and try to find an 11x5.5 APC. How does my setup sound so far? Did I do my math correctly |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
ORIGINAL: LuckyArmpit I also have this plane. I went with the rimfire thats recommended. According to the great planes rep, an 11x7 E prop works perfect. Its one of the prettiest covering jobs I've seen. Great color combination. The control surfaces are very large therefore, not much deflection is needed for the plane to rip up the sky. As far as expo to use, I'd start with 50%. I have the futaba 9c so I can blend in quite a few settings. I also asked the rep about the landing gear. Basically, I told him why do model companies assume that everyone flies off of a paved runway? There are many of us who fly off of a grass runway. He assured me that the wood structure was much better than previous models. We shall see. I only use at minimum 2 inch foam wheels because smaller diameter ones get stuck on my field. Lucky... We paid special attention to the landing gear mounting area on the Reactor Bipe. I think you will find that the overall design of this airplane is very strong, without sacrificing weight. Best of luck with your Reactor Bipe...I think you will find that it will perform very very well on the recomended Electrifly components. thanks- George Great Planes/Electrifly |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I also just bought the Reactor Bipe but I'm going crazy looking for a motor for it. I have never tried the motors they recomend so I'm a bit hesitant on the Rimfire. I have never heard anything about them ( good or bad ). I have been looking into the Axi 2814/16 this is a very cole motor to the Rimfire specs or the 2820/12 but weighs 5.3 oz but will pull a 53oz 3D plane. My biggest concern is that I don't want a motor that will barely fly this 3D plane, I want more power than I need, but still want a light plane I can float by...........Some one help me PLEASE!!!
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
What would be the best servos to use for this plane? Hitec 65mg's? I see tower recommends the S3114's.
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I just ordered mine with 3114s all around. I've had a good experience when I equip my GP plane as they recommend, and based on the vids, I think it'll work pretty well. I hope to have mine before Friday, I'll take plenty of pics as I build, and a complete report of the maiden and subsequent flights, mods, etc... STOKED about this new bird! :D
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
ORIGINAL: FoamyVictim I just ordered mine with 3114s all around. I've had a good experience when I equip my GP plane as they recommend, and based on the vids, I think it'll work pretty well. I hope to have mine before Friday, I'll take plenty of pics as I build, and a complete report of the maiden and subsequent flights, mods, etc... STOKED about this new bird! :D thanks Chris |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Sad story, but looking forward to a happy ending:
Well, I tried to post the pics, but they won't work on this site. So here's link to our site: http://z6.invisionfree.com/Bug_Bite_...=92&st=0&#last |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Would this plane be suitable for a OS 25 or Webra 36 glow engine conversion you think ?
I need a plane for my small engines that I have lying around doing nothing...... ;) |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Did this thread die or what? I just ordered my Reactor Bipe from Great Planes, I was hoping that someone would do a build thread on it. I will if no one else wants to. I plan on going with the stock set-up that GP recommends, and either the Futabe 7C or the new 10C. The reviews in model magazines have given this plane high marks, so lets get this thread going.
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I just maidened my Reactor Bipe yesterday. This thing is awesome! I'm not great at 3d, but this plane made me look like a genius! It had no bad characteristics (I'm using the recommended setup) and I enjoyed the heck out of flying it. When flown flat out on a pass this thing will move. I had no problem with hovering and just flipped it all over the place. With the low rates set I was able to bring it to a nice slow landing.
What really impressed me is that I had absolutely no trimming out on the first flight. Use the wing alignment jigs provided and the aileron setup is spot on! Using my thunder power 2100 packs (I have two) I was able to get 6-7 minutes of flight each. This draws a lot more current than my other electrics I use the packs in. Steve |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
just picked up the bipe and got it home. if this thing flys as good as it looks i'l be on happy camper looks like they really took the time to do the prefab on this,looks like it will go together pretty easy.am ordering the power sys and elects for it now, getting 4 hs65 servos
a turnigy 35-36 motor and a 40 amp esc with a 3-5a 6 volt switchable besc.have a friend using the turnigy motors and they have a lot of torque should be enough.only prob is i have to finish my stryker first then this.will let ya know how it flys from a fairly new flyers pov.and yes i have flown some foam 3d planes and bipes so i can actually keep it in the air for a bit lololol cya:D:D:D |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I have been thinking of getting a bipe for awhile now. looking at either the reactor bipe or the e-flite pitts. i'm leaning more towards the reactor since i already have 15 3s 2200 lipo's for my other electrics where as if i go with the pitts i'd have to get bigger lipo's. think i will get this in winter for a winter project to fly next spring.
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Well I'm on my 2nd Bipe.. So far very happy with using the recommend Rimfire and a Thunderbird 36 ESC... I'm also using hs65's all around and a hand full of Hobby city LiPo packs.
My only compliant was that with both kits I received incomplete hardware packages... The 1st one didn't have enough clevises and the 2nd was missing 2 control horns... Go figure... Luckily I had stuff laying around to makeup for the shortage and Great planes did eventully got me replacement parts.. It was just frustrating during a pre weekend assembly thrash... Oh and this is simply the most rugged fat fuz electric I have ever owned. And trust me it took a couple of tries to kill my first one... :-) Ed |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Couldn't wait to get home today from work, I knew that the brown truck would come today. Sure enough, there was a package waiting for me when I arrived. No damage to the box, WHEW!!!! I immediately opened it up and there was a big crease across the inside box, OH NO!!! I started removing the parts to inventory and........the top wing was damaged, *@#%!!!!!!!!!!! To late to call Tower tonight. Everything else looks good. This is one beautiful plane, I can't wait to get started. I will start Putting it together next week and posting pics of my progress if anyone is interested.
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Scalenut,
Two maiden flight suggestions... Watch the Aileron throw... Even the low rate is kinda high for a first flight... And the low rate on the elevator is a little soft you might want to consider a little more than recommend depending on your flying style... Sorry to hear about the wing, at least is is the top one so you will be able to do a lot of assembly while waiting for the replacement.. Good Luck, |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Almost finished assembling my Reactor, so far so good. Lots of thought was put into designing this plane. I find bipes are usually a pain to assemble, but not this one.
I paticularily like the way the top wing attaches, the wing jig makes it easy. The magnets for the cowl are a great idea, provided they hold of course. Having the covering pre cut for the vertical and horizontal stab is also a time saver. I like the way the wheel axles are not just screws. The only problem I've found so far is that my wheel pants don't fit properly against the landing gear. The hole for the axle isn't drilled correctly in the pants and the pant won't fit up against the landing gear. Did anyone else experience this problem? |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
ORIGINAL: malcolmm Almost finished assembling my Reactor, so far so good. Lots of thought was put into designing this plane. I find bipes are usually a pain to assemble, but not this one. I paticularily like the way the top wing attaches, the wing jig makes it easy. The magnets for the cowl are a great idea, provided they hold of course. Having the covering pre cut for the vertical and horizontal stab is also a time saver. I like the way the wheel axles are not just screws. The only problem I've found so far is that my wheel pants don't fit properly against the landing gear. The hole for the axle isn't drilled correctly in the pants and the pant won't fit up against the landing gear. Did anyone else experience this problem? My wheel pant holes were slightly off, but it's an easy fix. Once aligne they stay on very well. As for the cowl magnets, I've got 4 flights on mine and so far, so good! Steve |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Are there any plans for GP do a larger size of this plane in say a 5s or 6s setup?
Matt |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
ORIGINAL: sseward ORIGINAL: malcolmm Almost finished assembling my Reactor, so far so good. Lots of thought was put into designing this plane. I find bipes are usually a pain to assemble, but not this one. I paticularily like the way the top wing attaches, the wing jig makes it easy. The magnets for the cowl are a great idea, provided they hold of course. Having the covering pre cut for the vertical and horizontal stab is also a time saver. I like the way the wheel axles are not just screws. The only problem I've found so far is that my wheel pants don't fit properly against the landing gear. The hole for the axle isn't drilled correctly in the pants and the pant won't fit up against the landing gear. Did anyone else experience this problem? My wheel pant holes were slightly off, but it's an easy fix. Once aligne they stay on very well. As for the cowl magnets, I've got 4 flights on mine and so far, so good! Steve I could of course redrill the holes, but they would be so close together I didn't think that would work very well - is that what you did? |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Malcolmm,
Mine were'nt too far off, so all I had to do is clean up the holes and slightly elongate the holes through the strut. Once they pants align to the wheel strut correctly they lock into place very nicely. Steve |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
i've got 2 of the Rimfire 35-36-1200's and both run as expected.
they both have what i condsider a harmonic vibration and at low to mid throttle setting..........but one has a more pronounced noise associated with the vibration that is sort of like hearing 2 pieces of tin slapping at each other. it does not appear to be any grinding or anything like that, but just some wierd noise that goes away at higher rpms. but at full throttle there is a wierd noise too that after backing off the throttle and then going right back to full will go away. everything is tight and i do not feel andthing being loose, nor does this motor exhibit end or side play. it will pull 42 amps/434 watts at 9,740 rpm with an APC 11x5.5. should i exchange this motor or just keep it and see what goes? oh yes, sorry for the noob questions...........if it were a gas motor i would know how to analyze. |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
did you balance the prop?
|
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
ORIGINAL: tubamike78 did you balance the prop? it had the vibes and noise even without a prop. |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Summerwind,
Did you try a different ESC? The Great Planes ESC shouldn't cause any airframe vibes. I've had an ESC cause this in one of my planes. It must have been the timing of the ESC, because at certain spots, it resonated the whole airframe. Steve |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
Steve,
i tried it with both my Great Planes 35amp ESC and my Phoenix 45ampESC................i tried different props and even went to the trouble to mount it in the Bipe to compare. i sent it back today. there is just something that is a bit off about it. one thing i was impressed with in regards to these Rimfires though was that with the same prop, and fully charged battery, they both produce the exact same high rpm figures. the one i sent back just had this wierd harmonic resonance at a certain RPM. i also went ahead and placed an order for a 3rd motor, so when i get the replacement i will have 3 to compare with. if this resonance is in any of the 2 upcoming motors then i will know for sure it's just a normal thing. kinda expensive way to find out, but i can always use a spare right? |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I'm glad they took back your motor and will exchange it. I'm surprised that a defective motor will perform the same as one that is OK. Oh well, plenty of GP planes use the same motor setup. That's a great power setup for any 40" span performance plane - lots of power!
I've got to get my bipe up and running once again. I broke a prop and it seems to have loosened the motor mount box. The trouble is that I used a good bead of RC-56 to hold my cowl down and now it's tough to get off. I've been busy with my other planes and haven't gotten 'round to fixing the bipe properly, so it's been hanging around the shop. |
RE: Thoughts on Reactor Bipe?
I have about 40-50 flights on my Reactor Bipe and let me say that it has been a blast every single flight! If you have soft thumbs than fly it on hight rates all the time and it will reward you with smooth and slow flight, but throw the sticks around and it becomes wild on demand! I have had 3 crashes with this plan and every time the plane brook in a way that left it repairable with a little thin CA, 1/16th balsa, and time. i am flying with the recommended Rimfire 35-36-1200 and it has some climb out authority when paired with an APC 11X5.5 prop and a 2200mah Zippy-h pack. I think if I was to buy a new motor I would buy the 35-36-1000 and run an APC 12X6. MotoCalc shows 5oz more thrust for the same amp draw, wich is about 35 amps in Mississippi.
The harmonic thing you are talking about is not normal, at lest not on my motor. I fly mostly hard 3-d with this plan and have all the surfaces maxed out on throw and have moved the cg ~1/4" back form the recommended range. I also have the recommended s3114's in the wings and the digital s3154s in the tail with out any problems (other than easy to strip in case of hard landing). So I think that the recommended set up has more than enough power to satisfy most flyers, and if you want more power then go with the 35-36-1000 and have fun! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.