Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
 Funtana engine? >

Funtana engine?

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

Funtana engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2003 | 11:45 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , ISRAEL
Default Funtana engine?

Hey

Which engine will be better for the Funtana for 3D, an OS 61FX or a Saito FA-91S?

Thanks
Old 12-07-2003 | 01:09 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Caguas, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Default RE: Funtana engine?

I think this has been the most discussed subject on RCU. Go and do a search on Funtana/Saito 91, you will come up with a lot of stuff. The Saito 91S is the FAR better chocie for this plane, APC 15x4W and 30% heli fuel . Best
Victor
Old 12-07-2003 | 01:25 PM
  #3  
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sparta, TN
Default RE: Funtana engine?

satio 91 foar stroke for going strait up . it fly's better on a foar stroke and apc 15/4 w 30% heli fuel they like nitro.

two stroke for speed [THE FUNTANA DOS NOT NEED SPEED]
Old 12-07-2003 | 01:35 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , ISRAEL
Default RE: <span class=

Ok thanks. Any reason why I should get the Saito 91 instead of the 72 (except for the more power)?... How big of an improvment will I gain?
Old 12-07-2003 | 01:45 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , ISRAEL
Default RE: <span class=

One more thing, I notived on the RCU review that when they installed the Saito 100 on the Funtana it left a pretty big gap between the spinner and the cowl. How big if any will be the gap with the Saito 91?
Old 12-07-2003 | 02:12 PM
  #6  
Varad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default RE: <span class=

why would the .61 be a bad choice?? Itll be better than that 91 four stroke.
Old 12-07-2003 | 02:20 PM
  #7  
Ian.W's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Essex, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: <span class=

Its all about torque. And thats all i know

Does anyone run a YS 63 on these planes?
Old 12-07-2003 | 02:25 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , ISRAEL
Default RE: <span class=

I think that the OS61 is not better than the Saito 91 cause you need more torque for 3D than speed and the OS61 has more speed (and probably weighs more) which I dont need for this kind of plane.
Old 12-07-2003 | 03:48 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: port orchard, WA
Default RE: <span class=

i got a YS 63 on mine. flies great. love the combo.

Kyle
Old 12-10-2003 | 12:15 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Dalton, GA
Default got to go with the Saito 100

PlagueWielder,

I first put a Saito 72 on it and it had "OK" power(would hover and pull out slow). I read too much about the 100 and just changed to it and have 6-8 flights on it. WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There is no other combo as far as I'm concerned! By the way, it weighs less than the 91. I'm at 6 lbs even and have tons of pullout power.

It still flies light - elevators upright and inverted the same, hovers and harriers as good and no bad tendacies with 3.5 more ounces than the 72.

Most fun I've had with plane since I started 2 years ago!
Old 12-10-2003 | 08:24 AM
  #11  
peteflyrc's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fallon, MT
Default funtana

I have a supertigre 90 2stroke on mine with a 15-4 prop and it has plenty of power ,I do sugest you pin the fire wall for strengh ,when putting a bigger engine on it ..mine will 3d at a 1/4 throtle with no problem[8D]
Old 12-10-2003 | 09:25 AM
  #12  
RightThrust's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ocala, FL
Default RE: Funtana engine?

ORIGINAL: PlagueWielder

Hey

Which engine will be better for the Funtana for 3D, an OS 61FX or a Saito FA-91S?

Thanks
Hey

Old 12-10-2003 | 04:37 PM
  #13  
Mokken's Avatar
My Feedback: (63)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bethlehem, GA
Default RE: Funtana engine?

I have a YS .63 on mine and the unlimted vertical, hovering is not a problem...no rocket ship, but power to weight ratio is very important. The Saito .91 or 100 would be fine though.
Old 12-10-2003 | 05:12 PM
  #14  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Flytown, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Funtana engine?

I had a TT 61 Pro two stroke in mine for a while but it wasn't a success. Could only just hold a hover with it and it was damn noisy too. More nitro would help, but we're pretty much limited to 5% here on cost grounds. Have an ASP 91 four stroke in it now but have yet to get out and fly it, just can't get the right combo' of free time and good weather! It should be a nice combination though, fingers crossed.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.