Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
 Harrier 46 engine choices >

Harrier 46 engine choices

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

Harrier 46 engine choices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2005 | 11:55 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Independence, MO
Default Harrier 46 engine choices

Well, I had the Thundertiger Spirit3d (looks like a harrier) and it was flying awesome on maiden flight day until I handed the radio to a buddy who lawndarted it right after take off. I was using the OS .46 but the spirit weighs like 4.5lbs compared to the harriers 5.5lbs. I was thinking about selling the 46 and getting something different. How would the os50 do? Or should I go with a .60? What about the saito 72. I would like to keep it as light as possible for good slow speed performance. THANKS!
Old 09-15-2005 | 01:44 PM
  #2  
Bodge's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Northampton, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

It performs well with the ASP 52 2 stroke.
Old 09-15-2005 | 03:19 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: salisbury, MA
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

ys .63 or satio .82... they are both able to throw a 14x4w apc prop depending on the fuel you use and they are both very light for the amount of torque they put out

since the .63 and .82 can throw larger props than 2 stokes in their weight class, that means the plane can fly even slower than the 2 strokes and will pull out of hovers better
Old 09-15-2005 | 08:30 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Murchison, TX
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I have the saito 82 on mine, it works well. Dont be scared to put a 91 4 stroke on this bird, after all mine weighs ~6.5 #'s. A 60 2 stroke would be good also, I just perfer 4 strokes.
Old 09-16-2005 | 10:48 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Independence, MO
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I would like to put a saito 82 (looks to weigh less than the 72!) or a 60 2-stroker but I just got the harrier together and I put the OS46 in there for the time being and it is already quite nose heavy. I have to put the battery pack towards the rear of the plane past the canopy bulkhead to get it to balance at the recommended CG. When you guys put those bigger engines in there are you having a difficult time hitting the CG??


Ps. I also have a Saito 100 sitting here....anybody try something that big in there?
Old 09-16-2005 | 06:00 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: salisbury, MA
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

when you say "big engines" which ones are you talking about?....the .63 and .82 weigh about the same as the OS 46...the satio 100 only weighs 3-4 ounces more than OS 46
Old 09-16-2005 | 08:08 PM
  #7  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Scottsbluff, NE
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

Jett BSE .76L.. Best of the best!!
Old 09-18-2005 | 12:26 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Independence, MO
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

saito 82 weighs around 470grams....but I think this is without muffler. The OS46ax weighs 489g with muffler
Old 09-18-2005 | 01:22 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: peterborough, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

ive got a JEN56 2st in mine but if i had the money it would be replaced with a saito82

they fly ok on the 2st but just seem better on the 4st it makes you feel calmer and everything seems less frantic

goony
Old 09-18-2005 | 03:37 AM
  #10  
Dealspeed's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Post Falls Idaho
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I run the 82 On mine and it came in at 6lbs 3oz Funny thing though it flies like it wieghs 4.5 pounds, but yea CG is hard to hit with a 17oz + motor.
Old 09-18-2005 | 08:35 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cedar Bluff, VA
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I built a custom battery tray one bay behind the radio compartment and used a 1400 mil nicad pack pack to get my Harrier 46 to balance at 140 mm behind the leading edge, with a Saito 82 in the nose. The plane weighs 6 pounds, 4 onces dry. Last Sunday my son was flying it and going verticle at a very good clip. He said "look where the throttle is". When I looked at the tranmitter, the throttle was dead on the half throttle mark. At full throttle the Harrier will go verticle at a very fast speed, it hovers at slightly over 1/3 throttle, this at 2000 ASL. I'm running a 15x4W APC cut down to 14 inches and 30% heli fuel. This package seem to work very well.
Old 10-22-2005 | 02:35 PM
  #12  
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jackson, MI
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

The Saito 100 4 stroke seems to be reasonable if you're careful with the throttle . Power always there when you need it . Too much and you rip the wings off .!~ That's what I'm going to use .
Old 10-22-2005 | 02:48 PM
  #13  
LANNYBOB's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: d.f.s., FL
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

i think the evolution 100 is overkill, infact it is
Old 10-23-2005 | 03:22 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Hampton, NH
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I have an OS 50SX and a Macs pipe in mine and it will hover at 1/2 throttle.
Old 10-23-2005 | 07:33 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Palm Bay, FL
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I have mine with Hacker C50 10L w/6.7:1 gearbox, APC-E 18x8 prop, TP6000 5S3P Li-polymer battery.
Hovers above 1/2 throttle, flying time around 20 minutes
Old 10-23-2005 | 10:51 PM
  #16  
FNG's Avatar
FNG
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Vancover, WA
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I dont have either YS 63 or Saito 82, but would like to get one. They seem to go for about the same, the price of fuel may help deside, do you need to run 30% Heli in the 82, how about the YS? How large of a tank are you guys running, what kind of flight times with 3D flying...

Thanks
Mark
Old 10-23-2005 | 11:12 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Murchison, TX
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I run 20% cool power MV(multi-viscosity) at 500' ASL. I also was in the same boat as you, I considered the YS-63 and found someone who had both and they liked the Saito 82 since it could swing a 15X4W well. I now own 2 saito 82's. Plus I'm not sure about the 63 but you cant get a YS 110 right now and probably wont for a while. YS just doesnt produce a lot of engines. If you already have a 90 size 4 stroke I would use it, Mine weighs 6.5 lbs.
Old 10-23-2005 | 11:45 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Idaho Falls, ID
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I don't have a YS63 but I do know they still show them in stock at Central Hobbies if you want to try one. I've had a couple of 82 and really love that engine. Mine have been in a UCD46 and Twist. I fly at 4800' elevation. I would be disappointed with anything but 30%. And I think both engines will run on less but thrive on more. I can only run a 14x4W here. Man if I could run a 15x4W I'd be in heaven. But it handles the UCD real good and it was a rocket on the Twist. UCD is 5 lbs 14 ozs.

Thanks
Barry
Old 10-24-2005 | 02:54 AM
  #19  
FNG's Avatar
FNG
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Vancover, WA
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

Super D & Barry, thanks for the input, what kind of flight time/oz fuel should I expect with the .82? Are we talking 10oz tank, 10 minutes of ripping it up?
Old 10-24-2005 | 08:07 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Murchison, TX
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

I havent actually checked my times, my guess is at least 12 minutes of hard flying once its broke-in.
Old 10-24-2005 | 08:30 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Idaho Falls, ID
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

12 minutes and 4 seconds.
Thanks
Barry
Old 11-08-2005 | 08:26 PM
  #22  
analog_boy's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: edmonton, AB, CANADA
Default RE: Harrier 46 engine choices

mine balanced perfectly with a OS 65LA but im putting a 91FX in it for next year. same wait better pullout.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.