Gas or Glow
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rossville, GA
I am getting ready to build a 72" One Design. I am still debating
whether to use a glow such as a Moki , Super Tiger or a gas.
Which ever way it will be around 30cc. I already own a ST3000
that is a very good and reliable engine.
whether to use a glow such as a Moki , Super Tiger or a gas.
Which ever way it will be around 30cc. I already own a ST3000
that is a very good and reliable engine.
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston,
TX
Check out this fine 25cc engine at www.gcbmrc.com . At $195.00, the price is right and there is lots of features.
Regards,
glowplugboy
Regards,
glowplugboy
#5
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From:

Yep, but the gas engines are heavy but powerful. I truly like your
ST3000 --------- Do a twin and grab another one. Or go with a 25 - 32cc and let it rip - just make sure you have enough surface area to keep that brick in the air. Good luck!
Fiddler
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston,
TX
Yes sir, the way I like to look at it is the GCBM R/C 25cc is one pound lighter than a US 25 and 12 oz. heavier than a G23. It beats both in the power department by about 20%, and the price is right. It has been used in airframes such as this one with sucess.
#8
Banned
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From:
Exactly how do you want this plane to fly? What type of flying do you like to do? Personally I'd stay away from gas on this one due to wieght- Who cares about power its the wieght that'll get ya. You don't want a 14lb 72" plane.
-Jon
-Jon
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: hampden, ME
Depending on the weight of the plane and how you intend to fly it, you might want to consider the RCS 1.4.
http://www.rcshowcase.com/RCS%20Engines.htm
http://www.rcshowcase.com/RCS%20Engines.htm
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rossville, GA
Thanks guys for the responses. The more I think about it I am leaning toward the ST 3000 that I have. It is one of the later models "K" series that has a ST4500 carb with a bushing in the barrel to restrict the flow. If i use this or a moki I should be able to keep the weight down to around 10 1/2 to 12 lb range. The ST was on a 80" sport plane (a Q-500 blowed up and modified to be more aerobatic ) it weighed 10 1/2 lbs. The performance was awsome. The One Design I am planning to sport fly and try to learn some 3-D. Yes I have been bitten by the 3-D bug too!!!!!
I like the looks of the One Design and there is not a dozen of them at the field when you go flying. I like the other planes but I just want something a little different.
I like the looks of the One Design and there is not a dozen of them at the field when you go flying. I like the other planes but I just want something a little different.
#11
Hey Johnny_Rebel
If you are the same Johnny Reb from the other forum, then you will be delighted to know that I have taken some of your ofttimes caustic advice to heart. I have a H9 1/4 cap, and I was going to put a ZDZ40 on it. Upon further review, I have decided to go with the O.S. 1.60 FX. It will come out a pound lighter, and I don't have to build a motor box or make any other special (heavy) mods to the airframe. I have a Midwest extra 300 kit, and I will use it as my entry into gas engines, and I will try to keep the cap as light as possible.
If you are the same Johnny Reb from the other forum, then you will be delighted to know that I have taken some of your ofttimes caustic advice to heart. I have a H9 1/4 cap, and I was going to put a ZDZ40 on it. Upon further review, I have decided to go with the O.S. 1.60 FX. It will come out a pound lighter, and I don't have to build a motor box or make any other special (heavy) mods to the airframe. I have a Midwest extra 300 kit, and I will use it as my entry into gas engines, and I will try to keep the cap as light as possible.
#13
Holy Mackeral! A 10-1/2 year old thread!
Any older and the third choice would have been coal fired steam. ;-)
Glow if under 7 pounds. Gas if over 10 pounds. In the gray area - dealer's choice.
Any older and the third choice would have been coal fired steam. ;-)
Glow if under 7 pounds. Gas if over 10 pounds. In the gray area - dealer's choice.
#14

My Feedback: (29)
My vote would be something in the 1.4 to 1.6 range. A 72" airplane for good aerobatic performance should not weigh more then 10.5 lbs. You will find howerver that the One design is not a 3D airplane. It does well for sport scale like aerobatics. If I was building this airplane I would be looking to a YS 120-140 or Saito 180.
#16

My Feedback: (1)
I really love the ST, but this days, GAS!
You can get cheap and reliable engine and it's a great save on the long run!
Try one of this: http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s..._8HP_33cc.html or this: http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...HP_2_94kw.html
I don't have one (Yet...) but have seen them working and it's a charm.
You can get cheap and reliable engine and it's a great save on the long run!
Try one of this: http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s..._8HP_33cc.html or this: http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...HP_2_94kw.html
I don't have one (Yet...) but have seen them working and it's a charm.




