Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
 Airplane design >

Airplane design

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

Airplane design

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-25-2008 | 10:35 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Madisonville, KY
Default Airplane design

What are some of the characteristics of different aerobatic planes? Particularly Edges, Extras, Caps, Yaks, etc.
I know that it is in the eye of the pilot but what are the differences of one compared to the others? There will also be differences in the manufacturer's products.

Any one want to compare?

Slopoke

Old 12-25-2008 | 11:03 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (31)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Kannapolis, NC
Default RE: Airplane design

some1 asked them a few months ago Tom at wildhard told it well see if you can seach that one out
Old 12-25-2008 | 11:21 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Greenville, SC
Default RE: Airplane design

Firstly, Merry Christmas!! Secondly, this topic has been pretty heated....but as long as the Yakkies don't attack I think we'll all be okay .

Seriously though, most of the differences between these planes vary more between MFG than the plane they're modeled after. Extras and Edges are very similar, as are Yak's and Sukhoi's. Caps are closer to edges/extras but aren't really in the same grouping. Same with Giles. Most Sukhoi's on the market are pattern-based and have small control surfaces. The same goes for Extras, but 3D extras are alot more common than 3D Sukhoi's.

Sukhoi's and Yak's have a lot of drag...so their downlines are slower than the downlines of Extras, Edges, or Caps. They tend to be better suited for slow flight, some claim they're better for 3D. Extras and Edges are really clean planes. They do great snaps and spins, have cleaner angles, and are better suited for a bit of speed. Some claim they're better for IMAC type stuff. I've never been impressed by a Cap. Every one I've flown (and most of the ones I've heard of) don't knife edge very well, snap excessively, and simply don't slow down well. Apparently they're great IMAC fliers, but don't slow them down! I only have experience with one Giles, and it was a 40% Carden. From what I've heard, they fly very well at speed. They're not great slow, but much better than Caps. This is what I experienced.

Really, though...I'm sure that Bill Hempel could 3D any Edge better than I could 3D a Yak, and that Quique Somenzini can fly any Yak at Pattern better than I could fly any Extra or Edge. I'm telling you, there are subtle difference between every model plane...but bigger differences between MFG's. I've flown a Phoenix Models Extra, and if it flies the same as my Aeroworks Extra I'm going to be very upset. I'm sure that they both are going to have some "Extra" characteristics...but it had better not fly like the Phoenix Models Plane!
Old 12-26-2008 | 09:06 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Madisonville, KY
Default RE: Airplane design

And A Merry Christmas to you.

Thanks for the info.

It's true that a good pilot can make any plane fly good. The Hempels and Quiques class is one level that I will never attain, but I appreciate what they do.

Slopoke
Old 12-26-2008 | 12:17 PM
  #5  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Norristown , PA
Default RE: Airplane design

the YAK IS ATTACKIN lol. I have a Yak 54 from seagull, ARF not assembled yet, but the trim scheme is great, along with the throws. I just cant wait to see it fly. Im gonna use an O.S. .91 FX, w/ a Pitts muff. Hopefully I can find a small smoke pump, and get that rocking. But, I was looking at an Edge, Im not into the cowl style, I prefer a full, open cowl. with this plane I plan to use it to start to learn 3D, and Aerobatics. Once I get proficient with this aircraft I want to have a plane w/ larger surfaces for 3D/High alpha flight.

to sum it up,

Seagull Yak= learn aerobatics, and High alpha.

Next plane= 3D flight
Old 12-26-2008 | 06:45 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Greenville, SC
Default RE: Airplane design

To be completely honest, that's the trick: buy the plane you like the best, looks-wise. I like the lean, clean looks of the Extras/Edges....that's why I have a brand-new AW Extra in the process of being assembled.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.