Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
lightest covering/ building light >

lightest covering/ building light

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

lightest covering/ building light

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2003 | 01:45 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Default lightest covering/ building light

all right, couldnt find good info anywhere else, and I know the 3d guys must know something. I realize translucent covering is lighter, but by how much? what brand is lightest? My favourite is ultracoat, but my guess is it is heavy . I was almost thinking along the lines of adhesive-less covering and balsarite etc...
note... this is for a laser 3d
if you have any other good "jenny craig" tips post em here... lets try to make a resource out of this thread as I couldnt find the info elsewhere on the site. Im going to go to some hobby sites and research claimed weights for various coverings.
Old 06-17-2003 | 02:05 AM
  #2  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Default lightest covering/ building light

heres an ok chart http://www.fatlion.com/sailplanes/weights.html
some info from tower

coverite 21st century is .25 oz/ft, same with translucent covering

monookote is .2 oz/ft, trans is same, except for clear which is .5 (mistake?)
Old 06-17-2003 | 04:58 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Noble, IL,
Default Covering

Nelson lite film is supposed to be 1/2 the weight of regular covering. The Ultracote on my sledge weighed in at 5 ounces for the finished covering job. Something to remember is the lighter covering is not as strong, and some of these airplane use the covering for strength. On the Laser 3D you will only save 3-4 ounces, but is the weight savings worth the sacrifice in strength? Tom
Old 06-17-2003 | 05:30 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Default lightest covering/ building light

well, the biggest strength contribution from covering is torsional rigidity in wings. Even cellophane on my electrics with no spars (only cf LE and TE) is all that is needed to make wing rigid enough

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.