1/4 scale CAP 232 engine?
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mohave Valley,
AZ
I purchased a used 1/4 scale CAP 232 from my local Hobby shop. As far as I can tell it is a Hanger 9 that has never been flown. I am using dual servos for the elevator and rudder mounted in the rear of the airframe to off set the weight of the engine. I want to run gas but I am having trouble deciding what engine to run. The hobby shop owner thinks that I should use a 26cc CRRC or Zenoah but I want real 3D power and am thinking about a 40-45cc. Does anyone out there have any suggestions? I am also modifying the airframe (lengthened the ailerons to meet the fuse., reduced weight where I can get away with it, and double beveled all of the control surfaces. I expect the flying weight to be 12-14lbs depending on the engine.
#2

My Feedback: (4)
Clearly, you're looking to go gas on this one, but you run the risk of ending up with an evil-handling overweight airframe (can you say snap 232?
).</p>To get good 3D perf, you really have to overpower while minding the weight build up. IMHO the best bet for this plane would be a OS 1.60 2-stroke with a 18X6 prop.</p>
</p>
</p>
#3
The CRRC 26cc engine has a great reputation for power, a lot of people are using it for 3D in 1/4 scale planes, I'm finishing up a 1/4 scale Yak with that engine in it. Most 1/4 scale planes with that engine are weighing in right around 10 lbs flying weight, and there have been reports of good 3D performance even over 12 lbs.
#4
Thread Starter
Junior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mohave Valley,
AZ
Thanks for the help. I was planning on using a 20oz fuel tank. That would make for around 2.5lbs of fuel. The 26cc engine weighs 2.5lbs. That would only leave me 5-7lbs for the airframe, radio gear, and batteries. Being that this is my first gas engine and I understand that you get much longer run times off of gas would it be worth the weight savings to go to a 10oz fuel tank or would that make my run time to short?
LOVEBIPES I respect that thought and I'm sure that it would be a great flying plane with a 1.60 glow engine but I am already spending $50 a week on nitro and am only flying two .75 engines, not to mention that the cleanup is a pain. I would imaging that 20oz of nitro would only last around 10 min. with that big engine. I try to fly every day before and after work for about an hour. I don't think I can afford that much fuel.
LOVEBIPES I respect that thought and I'm sure that it would be a great flying plane with a 1.60 glow engine but I am already spending $50 a week on nitro and am only flying two .75 engines, not to mention that the cleanup is a pain. I would imaging that 20oz of nitro would only last around 10 min. with that big engine. I try to fly every day before and after work for about an hour. I don't think I can afford that much fuel.



