U-CAN-DO 3D or Harrier 3D
 

Hi.

1.I am looking for .46 size which one should be better in hovering action U-CAN-DO 3D or Harrier 3D.
2.How abount the engine I should go with YS 63 or OS. 70 Ultimate.

Thanks.

RE: U-CAN-DO 3D or Harrier 3D
 

:)I haven't flown the Harrier but I have a lot of experience with the UCD. It hovers very easy. I don't see how the Harrier could be much easier. I think the YS63 would be a good engine but I think you'd be disappointed in the OS70. If not the YS I'd go with the Saito82. That's the engine I've used and I like it. Some have even used the Saito 100 or Saito/Magnum/OS91. All of those engines seem to work good. These UCDs and I'm sure the Harrier also are really fun planes to fly. You won't be disappointed.
Thanks
Barry

RE: U-CAN-DO 3D or Harrier 3D
 

Dunno about the airframe but I would recommend the YS-63FZ/S over any other 4 stroke in that class- The Saito-82 would be my second choice---

RE: U-CAN-DO 3D or Harrier 3D
 

I like my UCD46/Ys63fz..... But I started looking for more...
I'm in the process of installing a Mag 91 but still trying to find
a deal on a Saito 100.... Go with atleast the YS.... forget the
70... Better yet Saito 82 and up:-)

RE: U-CAN-DO 3D or Harrier 3D
 

I don't know about the Harrier but I have a U-Can Do .46 with a Saito 100 and have never looked back. Does everything most flyers are capable of.
K.O.

RE: U-CAN-DO 3D or Harrier 3D
 

I have the Harrier 46 with a saito 82, my only complaint was the weak landing gear, otherwise awsome plane with the 82, i was runing a apc 14x4w but switched to a master airscrew k series 13x8, fit my flying style better