RCU Forums - View Single Post - Do we need better defined categories?
View Single Post
Old 04-13-2006 | 11:36 AM
  #13  
dionysusbacchus's Avatar
dionysusbacchus
My Feedback: (25)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,490
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: McQueeney, TX
Default RE: Do we need better defined categories?


ORIGINAL: deputydog

Oh, and your POLL selections SUCK!!!!
LMAO That got me! I was trying to get people to call themselves lazy! LOL

People that are familiar with the EZone would know how this can be disasterous. On a few occasions, a thread category has been split over there, and now there are so many categories that sometimes threads don't get seen often, or responded to. For example, Scale Models became Glow to Electric Conversions,... then there was a new spawning of Electric Warbirds, Fuel Warbirds, Fuel Scale, Electric Scale,... it just got to be a mess.
Great points, but things get lost in the pit of Warbirds. I'm getting to where I don't even like to look in here anymore, sifting through all the what prop for my ARF questions.

My $.02,
I think the forums should be split like this:
ARF/RTF:
Warbird / Scale
Sport / 3D

Kit /Scratch Building:
Warbird / Scale
Sport / 3D

How about a category called "Will this motor power my plane?"
Great ideas there. I like that last category! How many times do we here that?

Right now we have "Warbirds" being built in the kit section that many people may miss. We have ARF's being built in the Warbird section. Personally I think this is a mess, I just wanted to see what you all think. Thanks for the input and participation I enjoyed reading all of your posts.

Dion