RCU Forums - View Single Post - Do we need better defined categories?
View Single Post
Old 04-14-2006 | 04:16 PM
  #38  
TLH101's Avatar
TLH101
My Feedback: (90)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,723
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Elephant Butte, N.M.
Default RE: Do we need better defined categories?


ORIGINAL: dionysusbacchus


ORIGINAL: TLH101

I want to vote, but the option I want is not there so:
"Do we need better defined categories?"
NO.
Thanks for the input, would you like to share the things you like about having everything mixed up? ARF's in the Scale forum, ARF's in the ARF forum, ARF's in the Warbird Forum. Warbirds in the scale forum, warbird build threads in the kit forum and the Warbird forum. You always have these hit and run answers and always negative. Why would having easier to navigate categories be bad? It appears you like RCSCALEBUILDER, talk about defined categories. Show me you can do more than just take shots at people and ideas, that would be a first.



More catagories just mean more places for people to post in the wrong catagory.
There are ARF posts in the ARF, Giant Scale, ClubHouse, Kit Building, Twins, Questions, Scale, and Warbird catagories now.
There are Engine posts in the ARF, Giant Scale, ClubHouse, Kit Building, Twins, Questions, Scale, and Warbird catagories now.
There are Radio posts in the ARF, Giant Scale, ClubHouse, Kit Building, Twins, Questions, Scale, and Warbird catagories now.
There are WWI posts in Scale, Giant Scale and Warbirds.
There are so many catagories, the moderators can't keep up with them now. If we get enough catagories, then there will only be 1 post in each.
I like it the way it is. Thats just my opinion!