RCU Forums - View Single Post - Sig's Extra 300 "XS" improperly named?
Thread: Sig's Extra 300 "XS" improperly named?
View Single Post
Old 12-19-2002 | 03:39 PM
  #1  
tool
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Oklahoma City
Default Sig's Extra 300 "XS" improperly named?
Anyone read that little tidbit about some manufacturers giving the wrong name to their Extra models in the latest Model Aviation?

There is no such thing as an "Extra300XS."

Two thoughts:

First, what should the name be for the Sig model? I assume Extra300SX? The control surfaces on the tail sure don't look oversized to me, though. But it's not like I got a ruler out and did a scale examination.

Second, and please bear in mind that I don't know IMAC rules, but since the airplane is improperly named, and if you have the 300XS graphic on the fuselage, would that somehow make it illegal at an IMAC contest?
tool is offline  
Reply Like